Fixed a hidden stack overflow bug
'memset' should been next step after 'NULL' judge
This commit is contained in:
parent
9d9432eb93
commit
c689c2c67f
|
@ -186,12 +186,13 @@ int fh_pwm_probe(void *priv_data)
|
||||||
PWM_Enable(pwm_obj, RT_FALSE);
|
PWM_Enable(pwm_obj, RT_FALSE);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
pwm_dev = rt_malloc(sizeof(struct rt_device));
|
pwm_dev = rt_malloc(sizeof(struct rt_device));
|
||||||
rt_memset(pwm_dev, 0, sizeof(struct rt_device));
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (pwm_dev == RT_NULL)
|
if (pwm_dev == RT_NULL)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
rt_kprintf("ERROR: %s rt_device malloc failed\n", __func__);
|
rt_kprintf("ERROR: %s rt_device malloc failed\n", __func__);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
rt_memset(pwm_dev, 0, sizeof(struct rt_device));
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
pwm_dev->user_data = &pwm_drv;
|
pwm_dev->user_data = &pwm_drv;
|
||||||
pwm_dev->open =fh_pwm_open;
|
pwm_dev->open =fh_pwm_open;
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue