Fix error in powf for x close to 1 and large y
This patch fixes the error found by Paul Zimmermann (see https://homepages.loria.fr/PZimmermann/papers/#accuracy) regarding x close to 1 and rather large y (specifically he found the case powf(0x1.ffffeep-1,-0x1.000002p+27) which returns +Inf instead of the correct value). We found 2 more values for x which show the same faulty behaviour, and all 3 are fixed with this patch. We have tested all combinations for x in [+1.fffdfp-1, +1.00020p+0] and y in [-1.000007p+27, -1.000002p+27] and [1.000002p+27,1.000007p+27].
This commit is contained in:
parent
14123c991b
commit
cf1ef2dc5b
|
@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ ivln2_l = 7.0526075433e-06; /* 0x36eca570 =1/ln2 tail*/
|
|||
/* |y| is huge */
|
||||
if(iy>0x4d000000) { /* if |y| > 2**27 */
|
||||
/* over/underflow if x is not close to one */
|
||||
if(ix<0x3f7ffff8) return (hy<0)? __math_oflowf(0):__math_uflowf(0);
|
||||
if(ix<0x3f7ffff4) return (hy<0)? __math_oflowf(0):__math_uflowf(0);
|
||||
if(ix>0x3f800007) return (hy>0)? __math_oflowf(0):__math_uflowf(0);
|
||||
/* now |1-x| is tiny <= 2**-20, suffice to compute
|
||||
log(x) by x-x^2/2+x^3/3-x^4/4 */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue