* thread.cc: Use "%E" in *_printf throughout rather than calling GetLastError.

GNUify comments.
(__pthread_mutex_lock): Don't return error on EBUSY since that just means that
the mutex has already been initialized.
This commit is contained in:
Christopher Faylor 2002-09-30 01:19:45 +00:00
parent 881ffcb478
commit 79ed43004f
2 changed files with 150 additions and 156 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
2002-09-29 Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
* thread.cc: Use "%E" in *_printf throughout rather than calling
GetLastError. GNUify comments.
(__pthread_mutex_lock): Don't return error on EBUSY since that just
means that the mutex has already been initialized.
2002-09-30 Robert Collins <rbtcollins@hotmail.com>
* pthread.cc (pthread_mutex_init): Use new pthread_mutex::init.

View File

@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ pthread::self ()
void
pthread::setTlsSelfPointer (pthread *thisThread)
{
/*the OS doesn't check this for <= 64 Tls entries (pre win2k) */
/* the OS doesn't check this for <= 64 Tls entries (pre win2k) */
TlsSetValue (MT_INTERFACE->thread_self_dwTlsIndex, thisThread);
}
@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ pthread::precreate (pthread_attr *newattr)
{
pthread_mutex *verifyable_mutex_obj = &mutex;
/*already running ? */
/* already running ? */
if (win32_obj_id)
return;
@ -320,8 +320,8 @@ pthread::precreate (pthread_attr *newattr)
cancel_event = ::CreateEvent (NULL,TRUE,FALSE,NULL);
if (!cancel_event)
{
system_printf ("couldn't create cancel event, this %p LastError %d", this, GetLastError () );
/*we need the event for correct behaviour */
system_printf ("couldn't create cancel event, this %p LastError %E", this);
/* we need the event for correct behaviour */
magic = 0;
return;
}
@ -356,11 +356,11 @@ void
pthread::postcreate ()
{
InterlockedIncrement (&MT_INTERFACE->threadcount);
/*FIXME: set the priority appropriately for system contention scope */
/* FIXME: set the priority appropriately for system contention scope */
if (attr.inheritsched == PTHREAD_EXPLICIT_SCHED)
{
/*FIXME: set the scheduling settings for the new thread */
/*sched_thread_setparam (win32_obj_id, attr.schedparam); */
/* FIXME: set the scheduling settings for the new thread */
/* sched_thread_setparam (win32_obj_id, attr.schedparam); */
}
}
@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ pthread::exit (void *value_ptr)
mutex.Lock ();
// cleanup if thread is in detached state and not joined
if (__pthread_equal (&joiner, &thread ) )
if (__pthread_equal (&joiner, &thread))
delete this;
else
{
@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ pthread::testcancel (void)
if (cancelstate == PTHREAD_CANCEL_DISABLE)
return;
if (WAIT_OBJECT_0 == WaitForSingleObject (cancel_event, 0 ) )
if (WAIT_OBJECT_0 == WaitForSingleObject (cancel_event, 0))
cancel_self ();
}
@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ pthread::push_cleanup_handler (__pthread_cleanup_handler *handler)
// TODO: do it?
api_fatal ("Attempt to push a cleanup handler across threads");
handler->next = cleanup_stack;
InterlockedExchangePointer (&cleanup_stack, handler );
InterlockedExchangePointer (&cleanup_stack, handler);
}
void
@ -761,15 +761,15 @@ pthread_cond::pthread_cond (pthread_condattr *attr):verifyable_object (PTHREAD_C
this->mutex = NULL;
this->waiting = 0;
this->win32_obj_id = ::CreateEvent (&sec_none_nih, false, /*auto signal reset - which I think is pthreads like ? */
false, /*start non signaled */
NULL /*no name */);
/*TODO: make a shared mem mutex if out attributes request shared mem cond */
this->win32_obj_id = ::CreateEvent (&sec_none_nih, false, /* auto signal reset - which I think is pthreads like ? */
false, /* start non signaled */
NULL /* no name */);
/* TODO: make a shared mem mutex if out attributes request shared mem cond */
cond_access = NULL;
if ((temperr = pthread_mutex_init (&this->cond_access, NULL)))
{
system_printf ("couldn't init mutex, this %p errno %d", this, temperr);
/*we need the mutex for correct behaviour */
/* we need the mutex for correct behaviour */
magic = 0;
}
@ -808,7 +808,7 @@ pthread_cond::BroadCast ()
{
if (pthread_mutex_unlock (&cond_access))
system_printf ("Failed to unlock condition variable access mutex, this %p", this);
/*This isn't and API error - users are allowed to call this when no threads
/* This isn't and API error - users are allowed to call this when no threads
are waiting
system_printf ("Broadcast called with invalid mutex");
*/
@ -903,12 +903,12 @@ pthread_cond::TimedWait (DWORD dwMilliseconds)
switch (rv)
{
case WAIT_FAILED:
return 0; /*POSIX doesn't allow errors after we modify the mutex state */
return 0; /* POSIX doesn't allow errors after we modify the mutex state */
case WAIT_ABANDONED:
case WAIT_TIMEOUT:
return ETIMEDOUT;
case WAIT_OBJECT_0:
return 0; /*we have been signaled */
return 0; /* we have been signaled */
default:
return 0;
}
@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ pthread_key::~pthread_key ()
int
pthread_key::set (const void *value)
{
/*the OS function doesn't perform error checking */
/* the OS function doesn't perform error checking */
TlsSetValue (dwTlsIndex, (void *) value);
return 0;
}
@ -1040,7 +1040,7 @@ pthread_key::run_destructor ()
{
if (destructor)
{
void *oldValue = get();
void *oldValue = get ();
if (oldValue)
{
set (NULL);
@ -1049,29 +1049,28 @@ pthread_key::run_destructor ()
}
}
/*pshared mutexs:
/* pshared mutexs:
* REMOVED FROM CURRENT. These can be reinstated with the daemon, when all the
REMOVED FROM CURRENT. These can be reinstated with the daemon, when all the
gymnastics can be a lot easier.
*the mutex_t (size 4) is not used as a verifyable object because we cannot
*guarantee the same address space for all processes.
*we use the following:
*high bit set (never a valid address).
*second byte is reserved for the priority.
*third byte is reserved
*fourth byte is the mutex id. (max 255 cygwin mutexs system wide).
*creating mutex's does get slower and slower, but as creation is a one time
*job, it should never become an issue
*
*And if you're looking at this and thinking, why not an array in cygwin for all mutexs,
*- you incur a penalty on _every_ mutex call and you have toserialise them all.
*... Bad karma.
*
*option 2? put everything in userspace and update the ABI?
*- bad karma as well - the HANDLE, while identical across process's,
*Isn't duplicated, it's reopened.
*/
the mutex_t (size 4) is not used as a verifyable object because we cannot
guarantee the same address space for all processes.
we use the following:
high bit set (never a valid address).
second byte is reserved for the priority.
third byte is reserved
fourth byte is the mutex id. (max 255 cygwin mutexs system wide).
creating mutex's does get slower and slower, but as creation is a one time
job, it should never become an issue
And if you're looking at this and thinking, why not an array in cygwin for all mutexs,
- you incur a penalty on _every_ mutex call and you have toserialise them all.
... Bad karma.
option 2? put everything in userspace and update the ABI?
- bad karma as well - the HANDLE, while identical across process's,
Isn't duplicated, it's reopened. */
/* static members */
bool
@ -1101,21 +1100,20 @@ pthread_mutex::isGoodInitializerOrObject (pthread_mutex_t const *mutex)
HANDLE pthread_mutex::mutexInitializationLock;
/* We can only be called once.
* TODO: (no rush) use a non copied memory section to
* hold an initialization flag.
*/
TODO: (no rush) use a non copied memory section to
hold an initialization flag. */
void
pthread_mutex::initMutex ()
{
mutexInitializationLock = CreateMutex (NULL, FALSE, NULL);
if (!mutexInitializationLock)
api_fatal ("Could not create win32 Mutex for pthread mutex static initializer support. The error code was %d\n", GetLastError());
api_fatal ("Could not create win32 Mutex for pthread mutex static initializer support. The error code was %E");
}
pthread_mutex::pthread_mutex (pthread_mutexattr *attr):verifyable_object (PTHREAD_MUTEX_MAGIC)
{
/*attr checked in the C call */
/* attr checked in the C call */
if (attr && attr->pshared == PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED)
{
// fail
@ -1273,7 +1271,7 @@ semaphore::Post ()
int
semaphore::TryWait ()
{
/*FIXME: signals should be able to interrupt semaphores...
/* FIXME: signals should be able to interrupt semaphores...
*We probably need WaitForMultipleObjects here.
*/
if (WaitForSingleObject (win32_obj_id, 0) == WAIT_TIMEOUT)
@ -1314,7 +1312,7 @@ verifyable_object::~verifyable_object ()
magic = 0;
}
/*Generic memory acccess routine - where should it live ? */
/* Generic memory acccess routine - where should it live ? */
int __stdcall
check_valid_pointer (void const *pointer)
{
@ -1358,7 +1356,7 @@ pthread::thread_init_wrapper (void *_arg)
struct _reent local_clib = _REENT_INIT (local_clib);
struct sigaction _sigs[NSIG];
sigset_t _sig_mask; /*one set for everything to ignore. */
sigset_t _sig_mask; /* one set for everything to ignore. */
LONG _sigtodo[NSIG + __SIGOFFSET];
// setup signal structures
@ -1373,7 +1371,7 @@ pthread::thread_init_wrapper (void *_arg)
local_winsup._process_logmask = LOG_UPTO (LOG_DEBUG);
/*This is not checked by the OS !! */
/* This is not checked by the OS !! */
if (!TlsSetValue (MT_INTERFACE->reent_index, &local_reent))
system_printf ("local storage for thread couldn't be set");
@ -1402,7 +1400,7 @@ pthread::thread_init_wrapper (void *_arg)
// ??? This code only runs if the thread exits by returning.
// it's all now in __pthread_exit ();
#endif
/*never reached */
/* never reached */
return 0;
}
@ -1448,8 +1446,8 @@ pthread::once (pthread_once_t *once_control, void (*init_routine) (void))
return 0;
pthread_mutex_lock (&once_control->mutex);
/*Here we must set a cancellation handler to unlock the mutex if needed */
/*but a cancellation handler is not the right thing. We need this in the thread
/* Here we must set a cancellation handler to unlock the mutex if needed */
/* but a cancellation handler is not the right thing. We need this in the thread
*cleanup routine. Assumption: a thread can only be in one pthread_once routine
*at a time. Stote a mutex_t *in the pthread_structure. if that's non null unlock
*on pthread_exit ();
@ -1459,7 +1457,7 @@ pthread::once (pthread_once_t *once_control, void (*init_routine) (void))
init_routine ();
once_control->state = 1;
}
/*Here we must remove our cancellation handler */
/* Here we must remove our cancellation handler */
pthread_mutex_unlock (&once_control->mutex);
return 0;
}
@ -1473,24 +1471,22 @@ pthread::cancel (pthread_t thread)
return thread->cancel ();
}
/*
*Races in pthread_atfork:
*We are race safe in that any additions to the lists are made via
*InterlockedExchangePointer.
*However, if the user application doesn't perform syncronisation of some sort
*It's not guaranteed that a near simultaneous call to pthread_atfork and fork
*will result in the new atfork handlers being calls.
*More rigorous internal syncronisation isn't needed as the user program isn't
*guaranteeing their own state.
*
*as far as multiple calls to pthread_atfork, the worst case is simultaneous calls
*will result in an indeterminate order for parent and child calls (what gets inserted
*first isn't guaranteed.)
*
*There is one potential race... Does the result of InterlockedExchangePointer
*get committed to the return location _before_ any context switches can occur?
*If yes, we're safe, if no, we're not.
*/
/* Races in pthread_atfork:
We are race safe in that any additions to the lists are made via
InterlockedExchangePointer.
However, if the user application doesn't perform syncronisation of some sort
It's not guaranteed that a near simultaneous call to pthread_atfork and fork
will result in the new atfork handlers being calls.
More rigorous internal syncronisation isn't needed as the user program isn't
guaranteeing their own state.
as far as multiple calls to pthread_atfork, the worst case is simultaneous calls
will result in an indeterminate order for parent and child calls (what gets inserted
first isn't guaranteed.)
There is one potential race... Does the result of InterlockedExchangePointer
get committed to the return location _before_ any context switches can occur?
If yes, we're safe, if no, we're not. */
void
pthread::atforkprepare (void)
{
@ -1528,10 +1524,9 @@ pthread::atforkchild (void)
}
}
/*Register a set of functions to run before and after fork.
*prepare calls are called in LI-FC order.
*parent and child calls are called in FI-FC order.
*/
/* Register a set of functions to run before and after fork.
prepare calls are called in LI-FC order.
parent and child calls are called in FI-FC order. */
int
pthread::atfork (void (*prepare)(void), void (*parent)(void), void (*child)(void))
{
@ -1576,7 +1571,7 @@ pthread::atfork (void (*prepare)(void), void (*parent)(void), void (*child)(void
callback **t = &MT_INTERFACE->pthread_parent;
while (*t)
t = &(*t)->next;
/*t = pointer to last next in the list */
/* t = pointer to last next in the list */
parentcb->next = (callback *) InterlockedExchangePointer ((LONG *) t, (long int) parentcb);
}
if (childcb)
@ -1585,7 +1580,7 @@ pthread::atfork (void (*prepare)(void), void (*parent)(void), void (*child)(void
callback **t = &MT_INTERFACE->pthread_child;
while (*t)
t = &(*t)->next;
/*t = pointer to last next in the list */
/* t = pointer to last next in the list */
childcb->next = (callback *) InterlockedExchangePointer ((LONG *) t, (long int) childcb);
}
return 0;
@ -1626,10 +1621,9 @@ __pthread_attr_getschedparam (const pthread_attr_t *attr,
return 0;
}
/*From a pure code point of view, this should call a helper in sched.cc,
*to allow for someone adding scheduler policy changes to win32 in the future.
*However that's extremely unlikely, so short and sweet will do us
*/
/* From a pure code point of view, this should call a helper in sched.cc,
to allow for someone adding scheduler policy changes to win32 in the future.
However that's extremely unlikely, so short and sweet will do us */
int
__pthread_attr_getschedpolicy (const pthread_attr_t *attr, int *policy)
{
@ -1693,7 +1687,7 @@ __pthread_attr_setschedparam (pthread_attr_t *attr,
return 0;
}
/*See __pthread_attr_getschedpolicy for some notes */
/* See __pthread_attr_getschedpolicy for some notes */
int
__pthread_attr_setschedpolicy (pthread_attr_t *attr, int policy)
{
@ -1712,8 +1706,8 @@ __pthread_attr_setscope (pthread_attr_t *attr, int contentionscope)
if (contentionscope != PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM
&& contentionscope != PTHREAD_SCOPE_PROCESS)
return EINVAL;
/*In future, we may be able to support system scope by escalating the thread
*priority to exceed the priority class. For now we only support PROCESS scope. */
/* In future, we may be able to support system scope by escalating the thread
priority to exceed the priority class. For now we only support PROCESS scope. */
if (contentionscope != PTHREAD_SCOPE_PROCESS)
return ENOTSUP;
(*attr)->contentionscope = contentionscope;
@ -1757,7 +1751,7 @@ pthread::join (pthread_t *thread, void **return_val)
if (return_val)
*return_val = NULL;
/*FIXME: wait on the thread cancellation event as well - we are a cancellation point*/
/* FIXME: wait on the thread cancellation event as well - we are a cancellation point*/
if (!isGoodObject (thread))
return ESRCH;
@ -1781,7 +1775,7 @@ pthread::join (pthread_t *thread, void **return_val)
*return_val = (*thread)->return_ptr;
// cleanup
delete (*thread);
} /*End if */
} /* End if */
pthread_testcancel ();
@ -1802,7 +1796,7 @@ pthread::detach (pthread_t *thread)
}
// check if thread is still alive
if (WAIT_TIMEOUT == WaitForSingleObject ((*thread)->win32_obj_id, 0) )
if (WAIT_TIMEOUT == WaitForSingleObject ((*thread)->win32_obj_id, 0))
{
// force cleanup on exit
(*thread)->joiner = *thread;
@ -1848,16 +1842,16 @@ pthread::resume (pthread_t *thread)
return 0;
}
/*provided for source level compatability.
*See http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/pthread_getconcurrency.html
*/
/* provided for source level compatability.
See http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/pthread_getconcurrency.html
*/
int
__pthread_getconcurrency (void)
{
return MT_INTERFACE->concurrency;
}
/*keep this in sync with sched.cc */
/* keep this in sync with sched.cc */
int
__pthread_getschedparam (pthread_t thread, int *policy,
struct sched_param *param)
@ -1865,19 +1859,18 @@ __pthread_getschedparam (pthread_t thread, int *policy,
if (!pthread::isGoodObject (&thread))
return ESRCH;
*policy = SCHED_FIFO;
/*we don't return the current effective priority, we return the current requested
*priority */
/* we don't return the current effective priority, we return the current
requested priority */
*param = thread->attr.schedparam;
return 0;
}
/*Thread SpecificData */
/* Thread SpecificData */
int
__pthread_key_create (pthread_key_t *key, void (*destructor) (void *))
{
/*The opengroup docs don't define if we should check this or not,
*but creation is relatively rare..
*/
/* The opengroup docs don't define if we should check this or not,
but creation is relatively rare. */
if (pthread_key::isGoodObject (key))
return EBUSY;
@ -1902,9 +1895,9 @@ __pthread_key_delete (pthread_key_t key)
return 0;
}
/*provided for source level compatability.
*See http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/pthread_getconcurrency.html
*/
/* provided for source level compatability. See
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/pthread_getconcurrency.html
*/
int
__pthread_setconcurrency (int new_level)
{
@ -1914,7 +1907,7 @@ __pthread_setconcurrency (int new_level)
return 0;
}
/*keep syncronised with sched.cc */
/* keep syncronised with sched.cc */
int
__pthread_setschedparam (pthread_t thread, int policy,
const struct sched_param *param)
@ -1952,7 +1945,7 @@ __pthread_getspecific (pthread_key_t key)
}
/*Thread synchronisation */
/* Thread synchronisation */
bool
pthread_cond::isGoodObject (pthread_cond_t const *cond)
{
@ -1985,7 +1978,7 @@ __pthread_cond_destroy (pthread_cond_t *cond)
if (!pthread_cond::isGoodObject (cond))
return EINVAL;
/*reads are atomic */
/* reads are atomic */
if ((*cond)->waiting)
return EBUSY;
@ -2061,7 +2054,7 @@ __pthread_cond_dowait (pthread_cond_t *cond, pthread_mutex_t *mutex,
if (!pthread_cond::isGoodObject (cond))
return EINVAL;
/*if the cond variable is blocked, then the above timer test maybe wrong. *shrug**/
/* if the cond variable is blocked, then the above timer test maybe wrong. *shrug**/
if (pthread_mutex_lock (&(*cond)->cond_access))
system_printf ("Failed to lock condition variable access mutex, this %p", *cond);
@ -2079,13 +2072,11 @@ __pthread_cond_dowait (pthread_cond_t *cond, pthread_mutex_t *mutex,
if (pthread_mutex_unlock (&(*cond)->cond_access))
system_printf ("Failed to unlock condition variable access mutex, this %p", *cond);
/* At this point calls to Signal will progress evebn if we aren' yet waiting
* However, the loop there should allow us to get scheduled and call wait,
* and have them call PulseEvent again if we dont' respond.
*/
However, the loop there should allow us to get scheduled and call wait,
and have them call PulseEvent again if we dont' respond. */
rv = (*cond)->TimedWait (waitlength);
/* this may allow a race on the mutex acquisition and waits..
* But doing this within the cond access mutex creates a different race
*/
/* this may allow a race on the mutex acquisition and waits.
But doing this within the cond access mutex creates a different race */
InterlockedDecrement (&((*cond)->waiting));
/* Tell Signal that we have been released */
InterlockedDecrement (&((*cond)->ExitingWait));
@ -2153,7 +2144,7 @@ __pthread_condattr_setpshared (pthread_condattr_t *attr, int pshared)
return EINVAL;
if ((pshared < 0) || (pshared > 1))
return EINVAL;
/*shared cond vars not currently supported */
/* shared cond vars not currently supported */
if (pshared != PTHREAD_PROCESS_PRIVATE)
return EINVAL;
(*attr)->shared = pshared;
@ -2170,11 +2161,11 @@ __pthread_condattr_destroy (pthread_condattr_t *condattr)
return 0;
}
/*Thread signal */
/* Thread signal */
int
__pthread_kill (pthread_t thread, int sig)
{
// lock myself, for the use of thread2signal
// lock myself, for the use of thread2signal
// two different kills might clash: FIXME
if (!pthread::isGoodObject (&thread))
@ -2215,7 +2206,7 @@ __pthread_equal (pthread_t *t1, pthread_t *t2)
return (*t1 == *t2);
}
/*Mutexes */
/* Mutexes */
/* FIXME: there's a potential race with PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITALIZER:
the mutex is not actually inited until the first use.
@ -2234,15 +2225,15 @@ pthread_mutex::init (pthread_mutex_t *mutex,
DWORD waitResult = WaitForSingleObject (mutexInitializationLock, INFINITE);
if (waitResult != WAIT_OBJECT_0)
{
system_printf ("Recieved a unexpected wait result on mutexInitializationLock %d\n", waitResult);
system_printf ("Received a unexpected wait result on mutexInitializationLock %d\n", waitResult);
return EINVAL;
}
/* FIXME: bugfix: we should check *mutex being a valid address */
if (isGoodObject (mutex))
{
if (! ReleaseMutex(mutexInitializationLock))
system_printf ("Recieved a unexpected result releasing mutexInitializationLock %d\n", GetLastError());
if (!ReleaseMutex (mutexInitializationLock))
system_printf ("Received a unexpected result releasing mutexInitializationLock %E");
return EBUSY;
}
@ -2251,12 +2242,12 @@ pthread_mutex::init (pthread_mutex_t *mutex,
{
delete (*mutex);
*mutex = NULL;
if (! ReleaseMutex(mutexInitializationLock))
system_printf ("Recieved a unexpected result releasing mutexInitializationLock %d\n", GetLastError());
if (!ReleaseMutex (mutexInitializationLock))
system_printf ("Received a unexpected result releasing mutexInitializationLock %E");
return EAGAIN;
}
if (! ReleaseMutex(mutexInitializationLock))
system_printf ("Recieved a unexpected result releasing mutexInitializationLock %d\n", GetLastError());
if (!ReleaseMutex (mutexInitializationLock))
system_printf ("Received a unexpected result releasing mutexInitializationLock %E");
return 0;
}
@ -2269,14 +2260,13 @@ __pthread_mutex_getprioceiling (const pthread_mutex_t *mutex,
pthread_mutex::init ((pthread_mutex_t *) mutex, NULL);
if (!pthread_mutex::isGoodObject (themutex))
return EINVAL;
/*We don't define _POSIX_THREAD_PRIO_PROTECT because we do't currently support
*mutex priorities.
*
*We can support mutex priorities in the future though:
*Store a priority with each mutex.
*When the mutex is optained, set the thread priority as appropriate
*When the mutex is released, reset the thread priority.
*/
/* We don't define _POSIX_THREAD_PRIO_PROTECT because we do't currently support
mutex priorities.
We can support mutex priorities in the future though:
Store a priority with each mutex.
When the mutex is optained, set the thread priority as appropriate
When the mutex is released, reset the thread priority. */
return ENOSYS;
}
@ -2286,8 +2276,7 @@ __pthread_mutex_lock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex)
pthread_mutex_t *themutex = mutex;
/* This could be simplified via isGoodInitializerOrObject
and isGoodInitializer, but in a performance critical call like this....
no.
*/
no. */
switch (verifyable_object_isvalid (themutex, PTHREAD_MUTEX_MAGIC, PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER))
{
case INVALID_OBJECT:
@ -2297,12 +2286,11 @@ __pthread_mutex_lock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex)
if (pthread_mutex::isGoodInitializer (mutex))
{
int rv = pthread_mutex::init (mutex, NULL);
if (rv)
if (rv && rv != EBUSY)
return rv;
}
/* No else needed. If it's been initialized while we waited,
* we can just attempt to lock it
*/
we can just attempt to lock it */
break;
case VALID_OBJECT:
break;
@ -2343,7 +2331,7 @@ __pthread_mutex_destroy (pthread_mutex_t *mutex)
if (!pthread_mutex::isGoodObject (mutex))
return EINVAL;
/*reading a word is atomic */
/* reading a word is atomic */
if ((*mutex)->condwaits)
return EBUSY;
@ -2364,8 +2352,8 @@ __pthread_mutex_setprioceiling (pthread_mutex_t *mutex, int prioceiling,
return ENOSYS;
}
/*Win32 doesn't support mutex priorities - see __pthread_mutex_getprioceiling
*for more detail */
/* Win32 doesn't support mutex priorities - see __pthread_mutex_getprioceiling
for more detail */
int
__pthread_mutexattr_getprotocol (const pthread_mutexattr_t *attr,
int *protocol)
@ -2385,10 +2373,10 @@ __pthread_mutexattr_getpshared (const pthread_mutexattr_t *attr,
return 0;
}
/*Win32 mutex's are equivalent to posix RECURSIVE mutexs.
*We need to put glue in place to support other types of mutex's. We map
*PTHREAD_MUTEX_DEFAULT to PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE and return EINVAL for other types.
*/
/* Win32 mutex's are equivalent to posix RECURSIVE mutexs.
We need to put glue in place to support other types of mutex's. We map
PTHREAD_MUTEX_DEFAULT to PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE and return EINVAL for
other types. */
int
__pthread_mutexattr_gettype (const pthread_mutexattr_t *attr, int *type)
{
@ -2398,11 +2386,10 @@ __pthread_mutexattr_gettype (const pthread_mutexattr_t *attr, int *type)
return 0;
}
/*Currently pthread_mutex_init ignores the attr variable, this is because
*none of the variables have any impact on it's behaviour.
*
*FIXME: write and test process shared mutex's.
*/
/* Currently pthread_mutex_init ignores the attr variable, this is because
none of the variables have any impact on it's behaviour.
FIXME: write and test process shared mutex's. */
int
__pthread_mutexattr_init (pthread_mutexattr_t *attr)
{
@ -2430,7 +2417,7 @@ __pthread_mutexattr_destroy (pthread_mutexattr_t *attr)
}
/*Win32 doesn't support mutex priorities */
/* Win32 doesn't support mutex priorities */
int
__pthread_mutexattr_setprotocol (pthread_mutexattr_t *attr, int protocol)
{
@ -2439,7 +2426,7 @@ __pthread_mutexattr_setprotocol (pthread_mutexattr_t *attr, int protocol)
return ENOSYS;
}
/*Win32 doesn't support mutex priorities */
/* Win32 doesn't support mutex priorities */
int
__pthread_mutexattr_setprioceiling (pthread_mutexattr_t *attr,
int prioceiling)
@ -2463,7 +2450,7 @@ __pthread_mutexattr_setpshared (pthread_mutexattr_t *attr, int pshared)
{
if (!pthread_mutexattr::isGoodObject (attr))
return EINVAL;
/*we don't use pshared for anything as yet. We need to test PROCESS_SHARED
/* we don't use pshared for anything as yet. We need to test PROCESS_SHARED
*functionality
*/
if (pshared != PTHREAD_PROCESS_PRIVATE)
@ -2472,7 +2459,7 @@ __pthread_mutexattr_setpshared (pthread_mutexattr_t *attr, int pshared)
return 0;
}
/*see __pthread_mutex_gettype */
/* see __pthread_mutex_gettype */
int
__pthread_mutexattr_settype (pthread_mutexattr_t *attr, int type)
{
@ -2484,7 +2471,7 @@ __pthread_mutexattr_settype (pthread_mutexattr_t *attr, int type)
return 0;
}
/*Semaphores */
/* Semaphores */
/* static members */
bool
@ -2498,7 +2485,7 @@ semaphore::isGoodObject (sem_t const * sem)
int
semaphore::init (sem_t *sem, int pshared, unsigned int value)
{
/*opengroup calls this undefined */
/* opengroup calls this undefined */
if (isGoodObject (sem))
return EBUSY;
@ -2522,7 +2509,7 @@ semaphore::destroy (sem_t *sem)
if (!isGoodObject (sem))
return EINVAL;
/*FIXME - new feature - test for busy against threads... */
/* FIXME - new feature - test for busy against threads... */
delete (*sem);
*sem = NULL;