* doc/porting.texi: Fix typos.
This commit is contained in:
parent
631c8d784b
commit
4996145486
|
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
|||
2010-09-23 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
|
||||
Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* doc/porting.texi: Fix typos.
|
||||
|
||||
2010-09-22 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
|
||||
|
||||
* README: Add bfin to the list.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -104,18 +104,18 @@ the final executable image.
|
|||
Most of the time a tool chain does only have to support one target
|
||||
execution environment. An example of this would be a tool chain for the
|
||||
AMD 29k processor family. All of the execution environments for this
|
||||
processor are have the same interface, the same memory map, and the same
|
||||
I/O code. In this case all of the support code is in newlib/sys/FIXME.
|
||||
Libgloss's creation was forced initially be the @code{cpu32} processor
|
||||
family. There are many different execution environments for this line,
|
||||
and they vary wildly. newlib itself has only has a few dependencies that
|
||||
it needs for each target. These are explained later in this doc. The
|
||||
hardware dependent part of newlib was reorganized into a separate
|
||||
directory structure within newlib called the stub dirs. It was initially
|
||||
called this because most of the routines newlib needs for a target were
|
||||
simple stubs that do nothing, but return a value to the application. They
|
||||
only exist so the linker can produce a final executable image. This work
|
||||
was done during the early part of 1993.
|
||||
processor have the same interface, the same memory map, and the same
|
||||
I/O code. In this case all of the support code is under newlib/libc/sys.
|
||||
Libgloss's creation was forced initially because of the @code{cpu32}
|
||||
processor family. There are many different execution environments for
|
||||
this line, and they vary wildly. newlib itself has only a few
|
||||
dependencies that it needs for each target. These are explained later in
|
||||
this doc. The hardware dependent part of newlib was reorganized into a
|
||||
separate directory structure within newlib called the stub dirs. It was
|
||||
initially called this because most of the routines newlib needs for a
|
||||
target were simple stubs that do nothing, but return a value to the
|
||||
application. They only exist so the linker can produce a final
|
||||
executable image. This work was done during the early part of 1993.
|
||||
|
||||
After a while it became apparent that this approach of isolating the
|
||||
hardware and systems files together made sense. Around this same time
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue