473 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
473 lines
16 KiB
Plaintext
|
# 2008 June 24
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
|
||
|
|
# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# May you do good and not evil.
|
||
|
|
# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
|
||
|
|
# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
#***********************************************************************
|
||
|
|
# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library.
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# $Id: select9.test,v 1.4 2008/07/01 14:39:35 danielk1977 Exp $
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# The tests in this file are focused on test compound SELECT statements
|
||
|
|
# that have any or all of an ORDER BY, LIMIT or OFFSET clauses. As of
|
||
|
|
# version 3.6.0, SQLite contains code to use SQL indexes where possible
|
||
|
|
# to optimize such statements.
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# TODO Points:
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# * Are there any "column affinity" issues to consider?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
|
||
|
|
source $testdir/tester.tcl
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
# test_compound_select TESTNAME SELECT RESULT
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# This command is used to run multiple LIMIT/OFFSET test cases based on
|
||
|
|
# the single SELECT statement passed as the second argument. The SELECT
|
||
|
|
# statement may not contain a LIMIT or OFFSET clause. This proc tests
|
||
|
|
# many statements of the form:
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# "$SELECT limit $X offset $Y"
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# for various values of $X and $Y.
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# The third argument, $RESULT, should contain the expected result of
|
||
|
|
# the command [execsql $SELECT].
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# The first argument, $TESTNAME, is used as the base test case name to
|
||
|
|
# pass to [do_test] for each individual LIMIT OFFSET test case.
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
proc test_compound_select {testname sql result} {
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
set nCol 1
|
||
|
|
db eval $sql A {
|
||
|
|
set nCol [llength $A(*)]
|
||
|
|
break
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
set nRow [expr {[llength $result] / $nCol}]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
set ::compound_sql $sql
|
||
|
|
do_test $testname {
|
||
|
|
execsql $::compound_sql
|
||
|
|
} $result
|
||
|
|
#return
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
set iLimitIncr 1
|
||
|
|
set iOffsetIncr 1
|
||
|
|
if {[info exists ::G(isquick)] && $::G(isquick) && $nRow>=5} {
|
||
|
|
set iOffsetIncr [expr $nRow / 5]
|
||
|
|
set iLimitIncr [expr $nRow / 5]
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
set iLimitEnd [expr $nRow+$iLimitIncr]
|
||
|
|
set iOffsetEnd [expr $nRow+$iOffsetIncr]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
for {set iOffset 0} {$iOffset < $iOffsetEnd} {incr iOffset $iOffsetIncr} {
|
||
|
|
for {set iLimit 0} {$iLimit < $iLimitEnd} {incr iLimit} {
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
set ::compound_sql "$sql LIMIT $iLimit"
|
||
|
|
if {$iOffset != 0} {
|
||
|
|
append ::compound_sql " OFFSET $iOffset"
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
set iStart [expr {$iOffset*$nCol}]
|
||
|
|
set iEnd [expr {($iOffset*$nCol) + ($iLimit*$nCol) -1}]
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
do_test $testname.limit=$iLimit.offset=$iOffset {
|
||
|
|
execsql $::compound_sql
|
||
|
|
} [lrange $result $iStart $iEnd]
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
# test_compound_select_flippable TESTNAME SELECT RESULT
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# This command is for testing statements of the form:
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# <simple select 1> <compound op> <simple select 2> ORDER BY <order by>
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# where each <simple select> is a simple (non-compound) select statement
|
||
|
|
# and <compound op> is one of "INTERSECT", "UNION ALL" or "UNION".
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# This proc calls [test_compound_select] twice, once with the select
|
||
|
|
# statement as it is passed to this command, and once with the positions
|
||
|
|
# of <select statement 1> and <select statement 2> exchanged.
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
proc test_compound_select_flippable {testname sql result} {
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select $testname $sql $result
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
set select [string trim $sql]
|
||
|
|
set RE {(.*)(UNION ALL|INTERSECT|UNION)(.*)(ORDER BY.*)}
|
||
|
|
set rc [regexp $RE $select -> s1 op s2 order_by]
|
||
|
|
if {!$rc} {error "Statement is unflippable: $select"}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
set flipsql "$s2 $op $s1 $order_by"
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select $testname.flipped $flipsql $result
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#############################################################################
|
||
|
|
# Begin tests.
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Create and populate a sample database.
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-1.0 {
|
||
|
|
execsql {
|
||
|
|
CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c);
|
||
|
|
CREATE TABLE t2(d, e, f);
|
||
|
|
BEGIN;
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 'one', 'I');
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3, NULL, NULL);
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(5, 'five', 'V');
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(7, 'seven', 'VII');
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(9, NULL, NULL);
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2, 'two', 'II');
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(4, 'four', 'IV');
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(6, NULL, NULL);
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(8, 'eight', 'VIII');
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(10, 'ten', 'X');
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(1, 'two', 'IV');
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2, 'four', 'VIII');
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(3, NULL, NULL);
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(4, 'eight', 'XVI');
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(5, 'ten', 'XX');
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(6, NULL, NULL);
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(7, 'fourteen', 'XXVIII');
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(8, 'sixteen', 'XXXII');
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(9, NULL, NULL);
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(10, 'twenty', 'XL');
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
COMMIT;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
} {}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Each iteration of this loop runs the same tests with a different set
|
||
|
|
# of indexes present within the database schema. The data returned by
|
||
|
|
# the compound SELECT statements in the test cases should be the same
|
||
|
|
# in each case.
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
set iOuterLoop 1
|
||
|
|
foreach indexes [list {
|
||
|
|
/* Do not create any indexes. */
|
||
|
|
} {
|
||
|
|
CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a)
|
||
|
|
} {
|
||
|
|
CREATE INDEX i2 ON t1(b)
|
||
|
|
} {
|
||
|
|
CREATE INDEX i3 ON t2(d)
|
||
|
|
} {
|
||
|
|
CREATE INDEX i4 ON t2(e)
|
||
|
|
}] {
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-1.$iOuterLoop.1 {
|
||
|
|
execsql $indexes
|
||
|
|
} {}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Test some 2-way UNION ALL queries. No WHERE clauses.
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.2 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d, e FROM t2
|
||
|
|
} {1 one 3 {} 5 five 7 seven 9 {} 2 two 4 four 6 {} 8 eight 10 ten 1 two 2 four 3 {} 4 eight 5 ten 6 {} 7 fourteen 8 sixteen 9 {} 10 twenty}
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.3 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1
|
||
|
|
} {1 one 1 two 2 two 2 four 3 {} 3 {} 4 four 4 eight 5 five 5 ten 6 {} 6 {} 7 seven 7 fourteen 8 eight 8 sixteen 9 {} 9 {} 10 ten 10 twenty}
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.4 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2
|
||
|
|
} {3 {} 9 {} 6 {} 3 {} 6 {} 9 {} 8 eight 4 eight 5 five 4 four 2 four 7 fourteen 1 one 7 seven 8 sixteen 10 ten 5 ten 10 twenty 2 two 1 two}
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.5 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1, 2
|
||
|
|
} {1 one 1 two 2 four 2 two 3 {} 3 {} 4 eight 4 four 5 five 5 ten 6 {} 6 {} 7 fourteen 7 seven 8 eight 8 sixteen 9 {} 9 {} 10 ten 10 twenty}
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.6 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2, 1
|
||
|
|
} {3 {} 3 {} 6 {} 6 {} 9 {} 9 {} 4 eight 8 eight 5 five 2 four 4 four 7 fourteen 1 one 7 seven 8 sixteen 5 ten 10 ten 10 twenty 1 two 2 two}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Test some 2-way UNION queries.
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.7 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION SELECT d, e FROM t2
|
||
|
|
} {1 one 1 two 2 four 2 two 3 {} 4 eight 4 four 5 five 5 ten 6 {} 7 fourteen 7 seven 8 eight 8 sixteen 9 {} 10 ten 10 twenty}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.8 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1
|
||
|
|
} {1 one 1 two 2 four 2 two 3 {} 4 eight 4 four 5 five 5 ten 6 {} 7 fourteen 7 seven 8 eight 8 sixteen 9 {} 10 ten 10 twenty}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.9 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2
|
||
|
|
} {3 {} 6 {} 9 {} 4 eight 8 eight 5 five 2 four 4 four 7 fourteen 1 one 7 seven 8 sixteen 5 ten 10 ten 10 twenty 1 two 2 two}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.10 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1, 2
|
||
|
|
} {1 one 1 two 2 four 2 two 3 {} 4 eight 4 four 5 five 5 ten 6 {} 7 fourteen 7 seven 8 eight 8 sixteen 9 {} 10 ten 10 twenty}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.11 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2, 1
|
||
|
|
} {3 {} 6 {} 9 {} 4 eight 8 eight 5 five 2 four 4 four 7 fourteen 1 one 7 seven 8 sixteen 5 ten 10 ten 10 twenty 1 two 2 two}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Test some 2-way INTERSECT queries.
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.11 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 INTERSECT SELECT d, e FROM t2
|
||
|
|
} {3 {} 6 {} 9 {}}
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.12 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 INTERSECT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1
|
||
|
|
} {3 {} 6 {} 9 {}}
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.13 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 INTERSECT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2
|
||
|
|
} {3 {} 6 {} 9 {}}
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.14 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 INTERSECT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2, 1
|
||
|
|
} {3 {} 6 {} 9 {}}
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.15 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 INTERSECT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1, 2
|
||
|
|
} {3 {} 6 {} 9 {}}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Test some 2-way EXCEPT queries.
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.16 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d, e FROM t2
|
||
|
|
} {1 one 2 two 4 four 5 five 7 seven 8 eight 10 ten}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.17 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1
|
||
|
|
} {1 one 2 two 4 four 5 five 7 seven 8 eight 10 ten}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.18 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2
|
||
|
|
} {8 eight 5 five 4 four 1 one 7 seven 10 ten 2 two}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.19 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1, 2
|
||
|
|
} {1 one 2 two 4 four 5 five 7 seven 8 eight 10 ten}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.20 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a, b FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2, 1
|
||
|
|
} {8 eight 5 five 4 four 1 one 7 seven 10 ten 2 two}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
incr iOuterLoop
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-2.0 {
|
||
|
|
execsql {
|
||
|
|
DROP INDEX i1;
|
||
|
|
DROP INDEX i2;
|
||
|
|
DROP INDEX i3;
|
||
|
|
DROP INDEX i4;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
} {}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
proc reverse {lhs rhs} {
|
||
|
|
return [string compare $rhs $lhs]
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
db collate reverse reverse
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# This loop is similar to the previous one (test cases select9-1.*)
|
||
|
|
# except that the simple select statements have WHERE clauses attached
|
||
|
|
# to them. Sometimes the WHERE clause may be satisfied using the same
|
||
|
|
# index used for ORDER BY, sometimes not.
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
set iOuterLoop 1
|
||
|
|
foreach indexes [list {
|
||
|
|
/* Do not create any indexes. */
|
||
|
|
} {
|
||
|
|
CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a)
|
||
|
|
} {
|
||
|
|
DROP INDEX i1;
|
||
|
|
CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(b, a)
|
||
|
|
} {
|
||
|
|
CREATE INDEX i2 ON t2(d DESC, e COLLATE REVERSE ASC);
|
||
|
|
} {
|
||
|
|
CREATE INDEX i3 ON t1(a DESC);
|
||
|
|
}] {
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-2.$iOuterLoop.1 {
|
||
|
|
execsql $indexes
|
||
|
|
} {}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.2 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5 ORDER BY 1
|
||
|
|
} {1 one I 2 two II 3 {} {} 4 four IV 5 ten XX 6 {} {} 7 fourteen XXVIII 8 sixteen XXXII 9 {} {} 10 twenty XL}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.2 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5 ORDER BY 2, 1
|
||
|
|
} {3 {} {} 6 {} {} 9 {} {} 4 four IV 7 fourteen XXVIII 1 one I 8 sixteen XXXII 5 ten XX 10 twenty XL 2 two II}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.3 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5
|
||
|
|
ORDER BY 2 COLLATE reverse, 1
|
||
|
|
} {3 {} {} 6 {} {} 9 {} {} 2 two II 10 twenty XL 5 ten XX 8 sixteen XXXII 1 one I 7 fourteen XXVIII 4 four IV}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.4 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5 ORDER BY 1
|
||
|
|
} {1 one I 2 two II 3 {} {} 4 four IV 5 ten XX 6 {} {} 7 fourteen XXVIII 8 sixteen XXXII 9 {} {} 10 twenty XL}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.5 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5 ORDER BY 2, 1
|
||
|
|
} {3 {} {} 6 {} {} 9 {} {} 4 four IV 7 fourteen XXVIII 1 one I 8 sixteen XXXII 5 ten XX 10 twenty XL 2 two II}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.6 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5
|
||
|
|
ORDER BY 2 COLLATE reverse, 1
|
||
|
|
} {3 {} {} 6 {} {} 9 {} {} 2 two II 10 twenty XL 5 ten XX 8 sixteen XXXII 1 one I 7 fourteen XXVIII 4 four IV}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select select9-2.$iOuterLoop.4 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE a<8 EXCEPT SELECT d FROM t2 WHERE d<=3 ORDER BY 1
|
||
|
|
} {4 5 6 7}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
test_compound_select select9-2.$iOuterLoop.4 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE a<8 INTERSECT SELECT d FROM t2 WHERE d<=3 ORDER BY 1
|
||
|
|
} {1 2 3}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-2.X {
|
||
|
|
execsql {
|
||
|
|
DROP INDEX i1;
|
||
|
|
DROP INDEX i2;
|
||
|
|
DROP INDEX i3;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
} {}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# This procedure executes the SQL. Then it checks the generated program
|
||
|
|
# for the SQL and appends a "nosort" to the result if the program contains the
|
||
|
|
# SortCallback opcode. If the program does not contain the SortCallback
|
||
|
|
# opcode it appends "sort"
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
proc cksort {sql} {
|
||
|
|
set ::sqlite_sort_count 0
|
||
|
|
set data [execsql $sql]
|
||
|
|
if {$::sqlite_sort_count} {set x sort} {set x nosort}
|
||
|
|
lappend data $x
|
||
|
|
return $data
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# If the right indexes exist, the following query:
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# SELECT t1.a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT t2.d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# can use indexes to run without doing a in-memory sort operation.
|
||
|
|
# This block of tests (select9-3.*) is used to check if the same
|
||
|
|
# is possible with:
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# CREATE VIEW v1 AS SELECT a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d FROM t2
|
||
|
|
# SELECT a FROM v1 ORDER BY 1
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# It turns out that it is.
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-3.1 {
|
||
|
|
cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 }
|
||
|
|
} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 sort}
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-3.2 {
|
||
|
|
execsql { CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a) }
|
||
|
|
cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 }
|
||
|
|
} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 nosort}
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-3.3 {
|
||
|
|
cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 }
|
||
|
|
} {1 1 2 2 3 sort}
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-3.4 {
|
||
|
|
execsql { CREATE INDEX i2 ON t2(d) }
|
||
|
|
cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 }
|
||
|
|
} {1 1 2 2 3 nosort}
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-3.5 {
|
||
|
|
execsql { CREATE VIEW v1 AS SELECT a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d FROM t2 }
|
||
|
|
cksort { SELECT a FROM v1 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 }
|
||
|
|
} {1 1 2 2 3 nosort}
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-3.X {
|
||
|
|
execsql {
|
||
|
|
DROP INDEX i1;
|
||
|
|
DROP INDEX i2;
|
||
|
|
DROP VIEW v1;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
} {}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# This block of tests is the same as the preceding one, except that
|
||
|
|
# "UNION" is tested instead of "UNION ALL".
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-4.1 {
|
||
|
|
cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 }
|
||
|
|
} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 sort}
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-4.2 {
|
||
|
|
execsql { CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a) }
|
||
|
|
cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 }
|
||
|
|
} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 nosort}
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-4.3 {
|
||
|
|
cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 UNION SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 }
|
||
|
|
} {1 2 3 4 5 sort}
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-4.4 {
|
||
|
|
execsql { CREATE INDEX i2 ON t2(d) }
|
||
|
|
cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 UNION SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 }
|
||
|
|
} {1 2 3 4 5 nosort}
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-4.5 {
|
||
|
|
execsql { CREATE VIEW v1 AS SELECT a FROM t1 UNION SELECT d FROM t2 }
|
||
|
|
cksort { SELECT a FROM v1 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 }
|
||
|
|
} {1 2 3 4 5 sort}
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-4.X {
|
||
|
|
execsql {
|
||
|
|
DROP INDEX i1;
|
||
|
|
DROP INDEX i2;
|
||
|
|
DROP VIEW v1;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
} {}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Testing to make sure that queries involving a view of a compound select
|
||
|
|
# are planned efficiently. This detects a problem reported on the mailing
|
||
|
|
# list on 2012-04-26. See
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users%40sqlite.org/msg69746.html
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# For additional information.
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-5.1 {
|
||
|
|
db eval {
|
||
|
|
CREATE TABLE t51(x, y);
|
||
|
|
CREATE TABLE t52(x, y);
|
||
|
|
CREATE VIEW v5 as
|
||
|
|
SELECT x, y FROM t51
|
||
|
|
UNION ALL
|
||
|
|
SELECT x, y FROM t52;
|
||
|
|
CREATE INDEX t51x ON t51(x);
|
||
|
|
CREATE INDEX t52x ON t52(x);
|
||
|
|
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
|
||
|
|
SELECT * FROM v5 WHERE x='12345' ORDER BY y;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
} {~/SCAN TABLE/} ;# Uses indices with "*"
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-5.2 {
|
||
|
|
db eval {
|
||
|
|
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
|
||
|
|
SELECT x, y FROM v5 WHERE x='12345' ORDER BY y;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
} {~/SCAN TABLE/} ;# Uses indices with "x, y"
|
||
|
|
do_test select9-5.3 {
|
||
|
|
db eval {
|
||
|
|
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
|
||
|
|
SELECT x, y FROM v5 WHERE +x='12345' ORDER BY y;
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
} {/SCAN TABLE/} ;# Full table scan if the "+x" prevents index usage.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# 2013-07-09: Ticket [490a4b7235624298]:
|
||
|
|
# "WHERE 0" on the first element of a UNION causes an assertion fault
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
do_execsql_test select9-6.1 {
|
||
|
|
CREATE TABLE t61(a);
|
||
|
|
CREATE TABLE t62(b);
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t61 VALUES(111);
|
||
|
|
INSERT INTO t62 VALUES(222);
|
||
|
|
SELECT a FROM t61 WHERE 0 UNION SELECT b FROM t62;
|
||
|
|
} {222}
|
||
|
|
do_execsql_test select9-6.2 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a FROM t61 WHERE 0 UNION ALL SELECT b FROM t62;
|
||
|
|
} {222}
|
||
|
|
do_execsql_test select9-6.3 {
|
||
|
|
SELECT a FROM t61 UNION SELECT b FROM t62 WHERE 0;
|
||
|
|
} {111}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
finish_test
|